ICT Project Management for Planning and Control Techniques

Question: Discuss about theICT Project Management for Planning and Control Techniques. Answer: Definition of Project Methodology Any type of project becomes successful only when the goals as well as objectives are achieved by specific methodologies of project management. This project is successful only when it is strictly followed by a defined schedule and budget. According to Schwalbe, 2015, there are various methodologies that help the organization to complete and execute its project properly. A project management methodology is a specific model that any project manager utilize for the employment to design, to plan, to implement and finally to achieve each and every project objective and goal. These are extremely beneficial for any project. There are various advantages or benefits that a project management methodology has within it and thus it helps to understand the entire scope of their work (Pinto, 2015). The most important advantage of a project methodology is that it helps to capture every element of project upfront and also educate the entire team of the project on several elements with their relations hips. The second advantage of this project methodology is that it helps in the proper implementation of the project by perfectly defining the project objectives. The output of the project completely depends on how much better methodology is being applied in the project (Fleming Koppelman, 2016). This, in turn is responsible for the improvement tracking of the project and for the perfect communication between the project team members. Moreover, the project management methodology also helps to reduce as well manage the risk of the project. This project methodology focuses on the deliberate approach for building the capacity within the project team to execute by proper training and perfect definition of the assets, tasks, roles, responsibilities, assets and anything or any activity related to project could be easily executed with project methodology. As per Burke, 2013, the most critical impediments of any project are timely availability and data consistency. All the structured approa ches remove the short comings with the help of project management methodologies. There are various methodologies that are utilized in project management. These methodologies help the project to be successful and become flexible. The most popular and exclusive project management methodologies majorly involve PMBOK, PRINCE2, Waterfall, Agile, Scrum, Agile XP, RAD, Spiral, SDLC and many more (Kerzner Kerzner, 2017). These methodologies are extremely advantageous for any project and thus help any project manager to understand the scope and benefit of the project perfectly. All the above mentioned project management methodologies are broadly classified into two kinds of approaches, which are modern approach and traditional approach (Walker, 2015). The traditional approach is the basic approach of project management methodology and is utilized for all types of smaller projects. Waterfall methodology is the most important example in the traditional approach. The second kind of project management methodology is the modern approach. Larson Gray, 2013 state that, this ty pe of approaches are majorly utilized in the modern industries like information technology. It provides perfect output and does not follow the previous ideology of project management. PRINCE2, PMBOK, Six Sigma and Scrum are the most famous methodologies in the entire broad concept of modern methodology. The methodology of project management plays the most important role in the project life cycle of any particular project. The major role of this project management methodology is that it helps to execute the entire project by not involving into any type of complexities (Schwalbe, 2015). Te budget of the project is strictly maintained in the methodology and thus is responsible for the overall growth of the project. The project life cycle starts from starting of a project and till ending of that project. Similarities and Dissimilarities between PMBOK and Agile XP PMBOK and Agile XP are considered as the two most significant methodologies in project management (Snyder, 2014). Both of these have their own benefits and disadvantages and they help to achieve the project goals and objectives perfectly. These two methodologies thus have various similarities as well as dissimilarities. The major and the most important similarities between PMBOK and Agile XP are given below: i) Excellent Outputs: The first similarity between PMBOK and Agile XP is that is that both of them excellent and accurate outputs for the projects (Turk, France Rumpe, 2014). These methodologies would be extremely beneficial when they are properly utilized by the project managers. ii) Project types: The second important similarity between PMBOK and Agile XP methodologies is that both of them are utilized in the bigger projects. Although, PMBOK is also used in the smaller projects, Agile XP is only used in the bigger projects or in projects that are bigger in size. Methodology Approach: This is third important similarity between PMBOK and Agile XP (Abrahamsson et al., 2017). Both of them fall under the category of modern approach in project management. PMBOK and Agile XP do have few of the dissimilarities as well. The most important differences between these two methodologies are as follows: i) Guidelines: This is the most important dissimilarity between these two methodologies of project management. PMBOK provides various guidelines for their users and how these could be utilized; whereas, there are no such guidelines present in Agile XP and thus often the project manager faces problem in utilizing this methodology (Popli Chauhan, 2013). ii) Risk Assessment: In PMBOK, the risks of the project are mitigated by proper risk management planning, risk identification and proper risk analysis. However, in Agile XP, this risk assessment is done by creating a specific prototype of the project. Communications Management: In PMBOK, the management of communications in a project is done by communications planning and by information distribution (Mishra Dubey, 2013). However, that in the Agile XP is done by utilizing system metaphor and daily meetings. Relating Agile XP with PLC Agile XP is the type of project management approach that is utilized for developing software under which the relevant requirements as well as the solutions are evolved via the collaborative effort of teams and end users. This approach helps in adaptive planning, early delivery and constant improvement in the project (Popli Chauhan, 2013). Moreover, this particular methodology is solely related with the project life cycle or PLC. The phases of this methodology helps to reduce the complexity of the project by not following the traditional approach. References Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., Warsta, J. (2017). Agile software development methods: Review and analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.08439. Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques.New Jersey, USA. Fleming, Q. W., Koppelman, J. M. (2016, December). Earned value project management. Project Management Institute. Kerzner, H., Kerzner, H. R. (2017).Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Larson, E. W., Gray, C. (2013).Project management: The managerial process with MS project. McGraw-Hill. Mishra, A., Dubey, D. (2013). A comparative study of different software development life cycle models in different scenarios.International Journal,1(5), 64-69. Pinto, J. K. (2015).Project management: achieving competitive advantage. Prentice Hall. Popli, R., Chauhan, N. (2013). Agile Software Development.International Journal of Computer Science and Communication,4(2), 153-156. Schwalbe, K. (2015).Information technology project management. Cengage Learning. Snyder, C. S. (2014). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK () guide.Project Management Institute: Newtown Square, PA, USA. Turk, D., France, R., Rumpe, B. (2014). Limitations of agile software processes.arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.6600. Walker, A. (2015).Project management in construction. John Wiley Sons.